首页> 外文OA文献 >Adult Attachment, Love Styles, Relationship Experiences and Subjective Well-Being: Cross-Cultural and Gender Comparison between Americans, Portuguese, and Mozambicans
【2h】

Adult Attachment, Love Styles, Relationship Experiences and Subjective Well-Being: Cross-Cultural and Gender Comparison between Americans, Portuguese, and Mozambicans

机译:成人依恋,爱情风格,人际关系经历和主观幸福感:美国人,葡萄牙人和莫桑比克人之间的跨文化和性别比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Attachment security, love styles, and romantic relationship experiences are closely associated with subjective well-being (SWB). A few studies have empirically observed significant relations between these variables. However, no studies have included all of these predictors to analyze the unique contribution of each to SWB, and no cross-cultural studies have analyzed these variables simultaneously. This article examined (a) the relations between attachment security, love styles, romantic relationship experiences and subjective well-being, (b) the unique contribution of each to predict SWB, and (c) cross-cultural and gender differences in the predictors of SWB across three samples of 1,574 university students: 497 from North Carolina (US), 544 from Maputo (Mozambique), and 533 from Lisbon (Portugal). We found cross-cultural differences in the three samples. The main predictor of SWB was attachment security in the US and Portuguese samples, while in the Mozambican it was eros love style. Storge love style positively predicted SWB in the US and Portuguese samples, but not in the Mozambican. In contrast, mania love style predicted the SWB of Mozambicans but not that of Americans or Portuguese. We found gender similarities and differences: the association between attachment security and SWB was not gender-specific; the associations between love styles, relationship experiences and SWB were gender-specific.
机译:依恋安全感,爱情风格和浪漫关系经历与主观幸福感(SWB)密切相关。一些研究从经验上观察到这些变量之间的显着关系。但是,没有研究包括所有这些预测因素来分析每个因素对SWB的独特贡献,也没有跨文化研究同时分析这些变量。本文研究了(a)依恋安全性,爱情风格,浪漫关系经历和主观幸福感之间的关系;(b)每种因素在预测性别,情感和情感方面的独特贡献;以及(c) SWB涵盖了来自1574名大学生的三个样本:来自北卡罗来纳州的497名(美国),来自马普托的544名(莫桑比克)和来自里斯本的533名(葡萄牙)。我们在三个样本中发现了跨文化差异。 SWB的主要预测因素是美国和葡萄牙样本中的附件安全性,而在莫桑比克,这是色情风格。 Storge的爱情风格在美国和葡萄牙的样本中肯定预测SWB,但在莫桑比克则没有。相比之下,躁狂的爱情风格预示着莫桑比克人的SWB,而不是美国人或葡萄牙语。我们发现了性别的异同:依恋安全性与SWB之间的关联不是特定于性别的;恋爱风格,关系经历和SWB之间的关联是针对性别的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号